grokbot 是有自己身分、自己電腦的 agent，而且你不在時它也

grokbot 是有自己身分、自己電腦的 agent，而且你不在時它也繼續開著 示範裡「在職 AI 員工」長這樣： - 幕僚長 agent — 盯其他 agent、讀你的日曆，自動把任務派給對的那個 - 購物 agent — 登入你的帳號，訂票、買菜，再回報 - 行銷 agent — 登入你真正的 linkedin，掃過往貼文抓語氣，然後自己寫、自己發新的 - 工程 agent — 自己分流 bug 回報、啟動雲端編碼 agent，帶著 pull request、截圖和修復影片回來 介面不是儀表板，是聊天 — 形狀像在傳訊給同事，不用盯著 tool call 比任何 demo 都重要的數字：grok 4.6 在 cursor bench 拿 70.8%，每項任務 $2.81；fable 5 max 是 70.5%，$17.32 能力差不多，成本差 6x — 這才是能讓一隊這樣的東西跑得起、而不只是新鮮玩具的解鎖

原文：grokbot it's an agent with its own identity, its own computer, and it stays on when you're not here's what "active AI employee" actually looks like in the demo: - chief of staff agent - checks in on your other agents, reads your calendar, dispatches tasks to the right one automatically - shopping agent - logged into your accounts, books tickets, buys groceries, reports back - marketing agent - signed into your actual linkedin, browses your past posts for tone, then writes and publishes a new one on its own - engineering agents - self-triage bug reports, kick off cloud coding agents, come back with a pull request, a screenshot, and a video of the fix the interface isn't a dashboard, it's a chat - same shape as texting a coworker, no tool calls to babysit the number that matters more than any of the demos: grok 4.6 scored 70.8% on cursor bench at $2.81 a task, fable 5 max scored 70.5% at $17.32 same capability, 6x the cost difference - that's the unlock that makes running a fleet of these actually affordable instead of a novelty

整合