grokbot 是有自己身分、自己电脑的 agent，而且你不在时它也

grokbot 是有自己身分、自己电脑的 agent，而且你不在时它也继续开着 示范里「在职 AI 员工」长这样： - 幕僚长 agent — 盯其他 agent、读你的日历，自动把任务派给对的那个 - 购物 agent — 登录你的账号，订票、买菜，再回报 - 营销 agent — 登录你真正的 linkedin，扫过往帖子抓语气，然后自己写、自己发新的 - 工程 agent — 自己分流 bug 回报、启动云端编码 agent，带着 pull request、截屏和修复视频回来 界面不是仪表盘，是聊天 — 形状像在传讯给同事，不用盯着 tool call 比任何 demo 都重要的数字：grok 4.6 在 cursor bench 拿 70.8%，每项任务 $2.81；fable 5 max 是 70.5%，$17.32 能力差不多，成本差 6x — 这才是能让一队这样的东西跑得起、而不只是新鲜玩具的解锁

原文：grokbot it's an agent with its own identity, its own computer, and it stays on when you're not here's what "active AI employee" actually looks like in the demo: - chief of staff agent - checks in on your other agents, reads your calendar, dispatches tasks to the right one automatically - shopping agent - logged into your accounts, books tickets, buys groceries, reports back - marketing agent - signed into your actual linkedin, browses your past posts for tone, then writes and publishes a new one on its own - engineering agents - self-triage bug reports, kick off cloud coding agents, come back with a pull request, a screenshot, and a video of the fix the interface isn't a dashboard, it's a chat - same shape as texting a coworker, no tool calls to babysit the number that matters more than any of the demos: grok 4.6 scored 70.8% on cursor bench at $2.81 a task, fable 5 max scored 70.5% at $17.32 same capability, 6x the cost difference - that's the unlock that makes running a fleet of these actually affordable instead of a novelty

集成