從一月我把 openclaw 設定秀給爸爸看之後，他就對 agents 有興趣……

從一月我把 openclaw 設定秀給爸爸看之後，他就對 agents 有興趣。@bot 是第一個我敢放心推薦的。只花了一通 45 分鐘的電話。我是這樣排的： - 取得 SuperGrok - 下載 Grok Bot - 用概念解釋「一支 agent 團隊」 - 跑 app 內新手流程 - 建立他的第一個 agent - 解釋 agents 的電腦 - 做一次瀏覽器接管（Yahoo 沒有連接器） - 用第一個 agent 再建第二個專職的 - 設一個 routine（一天 3 次收件匣更新） 主要搞混的點是連接器 vs. 電腦。他授權了 Google Workspace 連接器，就以為電腦也登入了他的 Google 帳號。我把電腦解釋成只是另一個工具，不是 agent 的主工作站。你需要的若沒有專用工具，agent 才去拿電腦。 真正把他賣下去的是第一次收件匣更新。完全照他要的做，甚至今早還抓到一封媽媽寄來、他忘掉的。 電話結束時他像進了糖果店的小孩。點子多到不知道先挑哪個。

原文：My dad has been interested in agents ever since I showed him my openclaw setup back in January. @bot is the first one I felt comfortable recommending. All it took was a 45-minute call. Here's how I structured it: - get SuperGrok - download Grok Bot - explain "a team of agents" conceptually - run the in-app onboarding flow - create his first agent - explain the agents' computers - do a browser takeover (Yahoo doesn't have a connector) - use the first agent to create a second, specialized one - set up a routine (inbox updates 3x a day) The main point of confusion was connectors vs. the computer. He auth'd the Google Workspace connector, then assumed the computer was logged in to his Google account too. I explained the computer as just another tool, not the agent's main workstation. If a specialized tool doesn't exist for what you need, that's when the agent reaches for the computer. What really sold him was the first inbox update. It worked exactly as he wanted, even catching something from my mom this morning that he forgot about. By the end of the call he was a kid in a candy store. Too many ideas to choose from.

整合