从一月我把 openclaw 设置秀给爸爸看之后，他就对 agents 有兴趣……

从一月我把 openclaw 设置秀给爸爸看之后，他就对 agents 有兴趣。@bot 是第一个我敢放心推荐的。只花了一通 45 分钟的电话。我是这样排的： - 取得 SuperGrok - 下载 Grok Bot - 用概念解释“一支 agent 团队” - 跑 app 内新手流程 - 建立他的第一个 agent - 解释 agents 的电脑 - 做一次浏览器接管（Yahoo 没有连接器） - 用第一个 agent 再建第二个专职的 - 设一个 routine（一天 3 次收件箱更新） 主要搞混的点是连接器 vs. 电脑。他授权了 Google Workspace 连接器，就以为电脑也登录了他的 Google 账号。我把电脑解释成只是另一个工具，不是 agent 的主工作站。你需要的若没有专用工具，agent 才去拿电脑。 真正把他卖下去的是第一次收件箱更新。完全照他要的做，甚至今早还抓到一封妈妈寄来、他忘掉的。 电话结束时他像进了糖果店的小孩。点子多到不知道先挑哪个。

原文：My dad has been interested in agents ever since I showed him my openclaw setup back in January. @bot is the first one I felt comfortable recommending. All it took was a 45-minute call. Here's how I structured it: - get SuperGrok - download Grok Bot - explain "a team of agents" conceptually - run the in-app onboarding flow - create his first agent - explain the agents' computers - do a browser takeover (Yahoo doesn't have a connector) - use the first agent to create a second, specialized one - set up a routine (inbox updates 3x a day) The main point of confusion was connectors vs. the computer. He auth'd the Google Workspace connector, then assumed the computer was logged in to his Google account too. I explained the computer as just another tool, not the agent's main workstation. If a specialized tool doesn't exist for what you need, that's when the agent reaches for the computer. What really sold him was the first inbox update. It worked exactly as he wanted, even catching something from my mom this morning that he forgot about. By the end of the call he was a kid in a candy store. Too many ideas to choose from.

集成