I came across an interesting issue with Grok @bot Sometimes it assumes...

I came across an interesting issue with Grok @bot Sometimes it assumes something is true without full validation or context, and writes it straight into the bot's identity Here's how I handle it 👇 I paste a write rule into every new bot that splits memory into 3 drawers: 1. Profile: The stable identity, loaded into the prompt every turn. The one place a stray "maybe" or an old product line should never sneak into. 2. Log: Dated history, one line per event. What happened, not who the bot is. 3. Note: This week's blocker or pending item. Drops off the always-visible list once it's ranked low, but stays on disk until you Forget it. Here's the exact block: "PROFILE MEMORY Write to own profile only when the fact is stable and needed every turn. Test: if forgotten tomorrow, this agent does the job wrong every day. Else do not write profile. Profile scope: [lane coordinates] + [rules they mark stable]. Nothing else. If unsure, do not write profile. If it reads like a diary, it is log. LOG MEMORY Write when it reconstructs what happened and is not needed every turn. Log scope: [dated lane events]. One line. No chat diary. No profile repeats. NOTE MEMORY Write only when it should drop off the always-visible list once it's ranked low. The platform fades it from the prompt. It stays on disk until Forget. Test: useless next week is note. Needed every turn is profile. Worth finding next month is log. Note scope: [this-week blocker / pending]." Set this once and one stray chat never rewrites who the bot is.

Integrations